Indians need to drop the small market excuse and act like they want to win
It seems to be one of the first arguments youâll hear in defense of a struggling teamâand not just the Cleveland Indians. Any time a team fails to gain any ground on an opponent with a bigger payroll, ballpark, TV contract, etc., youâll hear the âwe canât win as a small-market teamâ. I think itâs near time we laid that defense to rest. Yes, there are certain advantages to being in a larger marketâbut that doesnât exclude the little guys from doing damage.
More from Away Back Gone
- Cleveland Guardians tantalizingly close to locking up AL Central tiebreakers
- Cleveland Guardians: Terry Francona becomes meme in profanity-laced ejection
- Say goodbye to defensive shifts and hello to bigger bases, pitch clock in 2023
- Cleveland Guardians: Shane Bieber second-fastest to 800 strikeouts in major-league history
- The next week will make or break the Cleveland Guardiansâ season
The Associated Press did a study early in the season to forecast 2015 payrolls. Itâs not a perfect science, as not all details of contracts are released. But through the information that is available, you can get a good idea of who are the top dogs and who isnât. Spoiler alert: The Indians arenât. But when you look at the bottom 10, thereâs something you should notice.
Three of the bottom ten teamsâfrom the beginning of the seasonâmade the playoffs. And the New York Mets are currently playing in the World Series. Well, theyâre there, not really doing much of the playing thing as of yet. Now I can admit that all of these teams are in different stages that brought them to a similar point.
The Padres werenât very good, so new GM A.J. Preller went out and spent big money. Several large deals combined with the players they had still left them in the bottom third and the play didnât elevate. The Braves have begun a rebuilding period, and the Marlins arenât far removed from a gut job on their franchise either. But the Athletics, Rays and now the Astros have won either this year or very recently with smart management.
The Astros and Cubs (who are 13th, thanks in large part to Jon Lesterâs deal) built through losing. It sounds counterintuitive, but it worked very well for those two. But not many teams or fan bases want to sit through several years of losing. The Cubs were able to handle five more without issue, itâs been a while.
Billy Beane and the Aâs built a roster through âMoneyballâ, the analytical, evidence-based approachâsabermetricsâto put themselves in the thick of things. It wasnât till Beane broke from that last year to acquire several big names at the trade deadline did it seem to dissolve the good thing they had going.
The Rays? Theyâre just the Rays. Without Joe Maddon who took off for Chicago, they finished fourth but still managed to win 80 games this season. Unpleasant ballpark (but at least itâs a dome), terrible weather (refer to ballpark for its saving grace), but they keep finding a way to win with names you likely have never heard of in your life.
And then thereâs the Indians. The only thing lower than the payroll was the attendance. Progressive Field isnât a terrible place to see a game, and they continue to pour money into the parkâwhich isnât drawing fans. But the Field of Dreams logic isnât working here. The Indians are building it, no one is coming. The phrase that has circulated for several years is âThe Dolanâs are cheapâ. Mutter that in a group of baseball fans and youâll get quite an array of responses. Itâs hard to defend that theyâre cheap when they are doing a multi-million dollar renovation, but it is part of the problem.
I donât even know that I would quantify them as cheap, but definitely careless with the money. The last few seasons of free agency have been a debacle, and this year they managed to rid themselves of all of them. Few of you can raise your hand and say you thought theyâd find a suitor for Nick Swisher. Yes, theyâve locked up players like Corey Kluber, Yan Gomes, and Michael Brantley long-term. But now they donât seem to have the resources available to improve on what they have.
Will it be another season of fill-ins, has-beens and gambles in free agency? Or will the Indians make the decision that they want to win and do whatâs necessary. That may be loosening up the purse string a bit, or maybe even trading a player that they donât want to in order to get a piece that they need. I had a reader say to me once that if they donât put a good team on the field early in the season, nobody will come later no matter how good the team plays. Sadly, that has been true.
So instead of investing in a ballpark that no one is coming to, how about invest in the team in it to bring those people in? Itâs a novel idea for, you know, a small market team.