Cleveland Indians All-Decade Team Studs and Duds: Pitchers and Bench

(Photo by Ron Schwane/Getty Images)
(Photo by Ron Schwane/Getty Images)
2 of 3
Next
(Photo by David Maxwell/Getty Images)
(Photo by David Maxwell/Getty Images) /

In the final part of our Cleveland Indians All-Decade Team series, we take a look at the Studs and Duds of the pitching staff and bench players.

Today we take a look at our third and final part of our All-Decade Team for the Cleveland Indians, looking at the studs and duds on the mound.

We’ll dive into both the starting rotation and the bullpen, looking at some studs and duds that helped shape the decade that was. Here’s a look at the best and worst pitchers the Cleveland Indians unleashed this decade, along with the best and worst of their bench players.

Starting Pitchers

This decade saw some of the best starting pitching in Indians history. That statement may come off as ridiculous to some of our older readers but I’d put this decade up against those great rotations of the 1940s and 1950s.

The dominance truly started in 2014 with the emergence of Corey Kluber, who would go on to win his first of two Cy Young Awards that year. Kluber would need his own article to describe all his accolades and dominance this decade; needless to say he’s our top Stud of the decade for starting pitchers.

He is the only two-time Cy Young winner in franchise history and also tied a franchise record, making five straight Opening Day starts on the mound (2015-2019). He’s arguably one of the five best starting pitchers in all of baseball this decade as well and one could make a strong claim he should have had a third Cy Young award this decade (2016). His 34.6 fWAR this decade was tops not only among pitchers but among all players for the Tribe this decade.

Carlos Carrasco is another easy call for stud of the decade. His career took a much longer path than Kluber as he made his Tribe and big league debut way back in 2009. However, it took many ups and downs between the bigs and AAA, surgeries, and even a move to the bullpen to get Carrasco to where he is today. But in nine seasons this decade (he missed all of 2012 with injury), he posted an fWAR over 24 overall and 23.4 as a starter. The third and final choice for stud among starting pitchers is not as easy though…

Trevor Bauer is the choice if you simply go by fWAR. He finished with a 16.5 mark, good for third place among starting pitchers this decade. However, he also threw over 1000 innings as a starter.

Justin Masterson meanwhile was fourth in fWAR at 14.5 but did so in 878 innings as a starter. Breaking that down to a fWAR/200 innings value, Masterson actually just beats out Bauer with a 3.30 fWAR/200 to Bauer’s 3.23. Masterson also posted a lower FIP, just edging out Bauer 3.76 to 3.86.

The wild card here is Danny Salazar who posted a 3.52 fWAR/200 thanks to a 10.6 fWAR in 583 innings. He also bested both Bauer and Masterson in FIP, ERA, K% and BB%. By all measures, Salazar was the best pitcher of the three. But he was about 300 innings behind Masterson and over 400 behind Bauer. So who do you go with, the elite that burned quick in Salazar? The steady groundball machine in Masterson? Or the machine in Bauer?

Most will likely disagree with this choice, but for me, Masterson gets the third and final spot. An easy case could be made for Bauer, no question. But Masterson was that ace for a while early on and Bauer just never seemed to pitch as well as we all hoped. Salazar ultimately burned too bright and injuries kept him off the list. Mike Clevinger is a guy most would like here too but he was under 500 innings and think he just didn’t have the innings to be a factor here.

As for the three duds of the decade, this is another hard choice. The Indians only had six pitchers post a negative fWAR for them this decade…6 in 10 years! And two of them made just a single start.

The pitcher that posted the worst fWAR is the first choice of our three duds for the rotation: Brett Myers. One of the big whiffs in free agency for the Tribe this decade, Myers was added before the 2013 season (along with other high priced additions), and he lasted just three starts before the Indians realized their mistake. He posted an impressively bad -0.5 fWAR in those three starts that totaled 16 innings. His ERA in those starts? 6.75. His FIP? A beyond ugly 8.67, which was by far the worst of any pitcher making at least three starts (Alex White at 5.69 was the second-worst).

The second dud of the decade was another veteran brought in, though this one at a much lower cost: Shaun Marcum. Of all the pitchers to post a negative WAR this decade, only Marcum did it while making more than three starts. He made six starts for the Tribe throwing 30 awful innings that included an ERA of 6.00 and a FIP of 5.77. Those six starts in 2015 were the last starts of his career as well.

The third choice was the really hard one for me. Derek Lowe was not good in his lone seasons with the Tribe but did manage to post a FIP under 4.5 and an fWAR over 1.0 so he avoided the honor. Previously mentioned Alex White was terrible but a rookie getting a couple starts before being shipped off to Colorado for Ubaldo Jimenez kept him away from the honor as well.

In the end, it was a battle between David Huff and Adam Plutko. They each had the honor of being the only two starting pitchers in the bottom 10 in FIP to throw more than 30 innings, with each topping 150 innings. They each posted identical 0.6 fWAR and neither was much of a strikeout or control artist.

By a nose, the third and final dud starting pitcher of the decade goes to David Huff and his 5.25 ERA and 5.27 FIP. 29 starts and 151 innings of bad…not ideal for a former first-round pick.

Studs: Corey Kluber, Carlos Carrasco, Justin Masterson
Duds: Brett Myers, Shaun Marcum, David Huff 

(Photo by Jason Miller/Getty Images)
(Photo by Jason Miller/Getty Images) /

Relief Pitchers

The Indians didn’t have the same level of dominance in the bullpen as they did in the rotation but that doesn’t mean there weren’t plenty of studs (and duds) this decade. The first two of our three studs should come as no surprises.

Cody Allen and Andrew Miller both dominated this decade. Allen as the Tribe’s closer and Miller as his electric setup man. Allen became the Tribe’s franchise leader in career saves and his 7.5 fWAR more than doubled that of second-place Miller (3.7). Allen threw 440 innings for the Tribe and saved 149 games. Things may not have always been perfect but he was the Tribe’s best reliever in the 2016 World Series and along with Miller and Bryan Shaw helped carry the team to Game 7.

Miller wasn’t around as long as Allen or some other relievers, being acquired in a blockbuster deadline trade in 2016, but his two and a half years in Cleveland were pure domination. Among Tribe relievers with at least 50 innings he posted by far the lowest FIP at 2.30 (Oliver Perez closest at 2.75) and his 13.32 K/9 was also tops for the Indians.

Injury slowed him down in his final season in 2018 but nothing comes close to those 2016-2017 years. He was named the Most Valuable Player of the 2016 American League Division Series as well. Another easy choice with Allen. The third and final stud though is a bit trickier…

After much debate, I finally settled on who I had envisioned from the start: Bryan Shaw. Anything but a fan-favorite, Shaw went out and just got the job done more times than not. A setup man who was always in the shadow of Allen and Miller, he helped form that three-headed bullpen monster in 2016. He posted the third-highest fWAR, coming in just behind Miller at 3.6. That was obviously aided by his 358 innings which ranked second to only Allen.

But he also posted a top 10 FIP at 3.45 (min 50 innings) and was arguably the best reliever in baseball down the stretch in 2013. His play in September of that year (along with Nick Swisher) helped the Tribe bullrush towards that Wild Card birth and really help set the tone for the rest of the decade.

Relievers like Joe Smith and Vinnie Pestano were right there with Shaw. Their FIPs were all within 0.05 of each other and Smith was even right there in WAR at 3.4. However, neither had the impact that Shaw did. Shaw took a beating too on innings and just kept on coming before he left in free agency. Gave the Tribe everything and then some.

As far as duds go…boy were there some bad ones. Trying to look at ones that actually pitched a few times though, the first dud of the decade is Neil Ramirez. Among relievers with at least 50 innings, he posted the worst FIP and fWAR at 5.47 and -0.4, respectively. Somehow he lasted more than a year with the Indians pitching in 2017 and being brought back (via arbitration even) for 2018.

Mercifully the Tribe finally cut bait with him after 16 appearances last year. There’s really nothing good to say about Ramirez other than it was cool having three guys with the same last name on the Opening Day roster last year…I guess?

The second dud is a guy I hate putting on here cause he is one of my favorite follows on Twitter: John Axford. Remember when I said Ramirez had the worst WAR among relievers with at least 50 innings? Well, Axford had a worse WAR at -0.5 though he fell just short at 43 2/3 innings. No one, regardless of inning minimums, posted a worse fWAR than Axford.

The most frustrating part of Axford’s struggles was that he left that 2014 and went on to actually have a very solid career. He moved on to Pittsburgh in 2014 and immediately turned things around and even had a good year in Colorado of all places the following year.

The third and final dud was a spot I spent way too much time mulling over. Hector Ambriz was a guy I looked at for the longest time. A Rule 5 Draft pick for the 2010 season and the Indians kept him in the big leagues the whole year (save for a couple of rehab outings). The Tribe rarely picks a guy in the Rule 5 draft and I can see why. A

mbriz was bad across the board with a -0.4 fWAR, 5.35 FIP, and 5.59 ERA in 34 appearances and 48 1/3 innings. They managed to keep him in the organization but he never pitched in the big leagues for them again and has been in the Mexican League the last four years. Veterans like Josh Outman and Chad Durbin also had some very forgettable (and bad) stints with the Tribe and were worthy of the dishonor here.

Ultimately though the choice for the final dud goes to Kerry Wood. I’ll be honest, I initially forgot he even pitched for the Tribe this decade (probably because 2010 isn’t’ actually this decade but I digress). He signed a two-year, $20 million contract before the 2009 season to the closer and boy did that backfire. One of the few large free agent contracts given out during the Shapiro years, Wood was coming off a 2.1 fWAR season as a reliever and was one of the best relievers in the game.

Unfortunately for the Tribe, they saw none of that in his one and half seasons with the club. Only his last year with the Tribe was this decade, and those 23 appearances and 20 innings were enough. He posted an ugly 6.30 ERA and 5.18 FIP while walking five per nine innings. His -0.2 fWAR wasn’t the worst but consider the lower inning total was arguably even worse than Ramirez or Axford.

Like with Axford, he found some success after leaving Cleveland with both New York and Chicago. But unfortunately for the Tribe, that was no consolation.

Studs: Cody Allen, Andrew Miller, Bryan Shaw
Duds: Neil Ramirez, John Axford, Kerry Wood 

(Photo by Jason Miller/Getty Images)
(Photo by Jason Miller/Getty Images) /

The Bench

One thing I noticed when doing the studs and duds for the position players was that some players just played too many different positions to win a dud award and some players while never stars were quite good coming off the bench or in platoon/utility roles. So in the final portion of our studs and duds of the decade, we’ll look at both the memorable and forgettable bench players, one outfielder and one infielder for each.

The stud utility infielder for the Tribe this decade was a tricky decision. Not a lot of backups played well on the infield for the Tribe. Russell Branyan came to mind though he was more of a first baseman only and all bat (though that 124 wRC+ was most impressive). Jayson Nix and Jason Donald were two Jasons guys that played a lot better than people remember or want to admit. In the end, though, I went with Mike Freeman, perhaps based on recency bias but his 1.0 fWAR was tops among bench guys that played multiple infield positions.

He wasn’t just a glove guy either like so many utility men as he hit a respectable .277/.362/.390. While his wRC+ may have only been 99 (or essentially league average), that on-base percentage alone made him one of the most valuable bench pieces the Tribe has had in a season in a long time.

For as bad as the Tribe outfields have been this decade, you’d have thought it would be hard to come up with a good bench outfielder due to not enough candidates but I surprisingly found the opposite to be true. Guys like Shelley Duncan, Austin Jackson, and Brandon Guyer had good stints as bench/platoon players for the Tribe this decade.

Jordan Luplow also burst onto the scene this past season and nearly won the award based off his 2019 play alone. However, Ryan Raburn is the one that takes the crown here. His 2.3 fWAR just edged out Luplow (2.2) and while he needed double the plate appearances to do it I felt his play over a longer time warranted the award over the hot year Luplow had.

Raburn was no slouch at the plate either hitting .257/.335/.465 with a 120 wRC+ in 243 games and 690 plate appearances. Raburn will always be remembered for that spike throw in the outfield, but he should be remembered as being the best bench player the Indians had this decade.

The dud utility infielder for the Tribe this decade was really a three-man race for the bottom. Mike Aviles, Michael Martinez, and Cord Phelps were the three that battled it out for the dud of the decade. Phelps posted the lowest fWAR at -1.2 and had by far the worst batting line, hitting a putrid .159/.221/.248.

However, he also only played in 53 games and amassed just 123 plate appearances. Mike Aviles meanwhile posted a -0.9 fWAR in 335 games and 1085 plate appearances. He hit better but still just a .244/.279/.345 mark with the same 70 wRC+ that Lou Marson had. Martinez was slightly worse than Aviles at the plate hitting .257/.289/.331 with a 64 wRC+. But like Phelps, he did it in only 90 games and 145 plate appearances, which explains why his fWAR was “only” at -0.4.

So after much deliberation, Mike Aviles edges out Phelps and Martinez for the dud bench player of the decade. He’s the choice since he stuck around the longer (three seasons) and his time in the last two years, in particular, were very bad. Overpaid and played in far too many games. His only saving grace was a decent stretch at the beginning of 2015 that gave Lindor the time he needed in Triple-A. But not even that could save him as he posted a -0.9 fWAR in that season alone.

The dud outfielder of the decade goes to a guy that I mentioned in the outfield portion the last week. Aaron Cunningham could have been the dud in either left field or right field but I felt he split too much time to take the crown at either position.

Here though? Not much of a contest really. In 72 games and 109 plate appearances, he posted a -0.5 fWAR, worst among outfielders for the Tribe and hit just .175/.245/.247. No, that’s not a typo, his slugging was really almost lower than his embarrassingly low on-base percentage. His 36 wRC+ was the third-lowest among players with at least 50 plate appearances, ahead of only Jesus Aguilar (19) and Cord Phelps (32). Only JB Shuck really came close to taking this award from him but only 26 plate appearances made it an easy call.

One dishonorable mention I wanted to include here would be Chris Gimenez. A backup catcher and utility man, Gimenez had a couple of stints with the Tribe and they were all bad. His -0.7 fWAR was the seventh-worst among players with at least 100 plate appearances. I didn’t do a backup catcher stud/dud but if I did, Gimenez would have won the dud award for sure.

Next. All-Decade Team Studs and Duds: The Infield. dark

So there you have it, the last of our Studs and Duds of the Decade for the Cleveland Indians. Plenty of names that will live on forever in Tribe lore, some that may have their numbers retired or in the Tribe Hall of Fame. And plenty that people can’t forget fast enough. So who are some studs and duds that you feel I missed? Who do you think will be some studs and duds of the next decade? Let us know in the comments below.

Next