Cleveland Indians Still Hurting From Bad Luck

1 of 3
Next

From 2009 to 2012, the Cleveland Indians endured four consecutive losing seasons, signaling the death of the hope that the 2007 playoff run would bring the glory of the former Indians dynasty back to life.  2009 also marked the lowest attendance total in 16 years, drawing fewer than 1.8 million fans for the first time since 1992.  Things were pretty bleak during those years, without much for the fans to root for besides the perpetual mantra that there’s always next year.  The Tribe is still working on a recovery from those years.

But what caused the fall of the franchise to such a dramatic failure for four straight years?  One obvious answer is that the Indians were (and to an extent still are) paying for some of the bad drafting and development in the early to mid 2000’s.  That’s been obvious for some time.  But there’s one more factor that we haven’t considered.  In addition to the poor drafts, the Indians were the victims of a much less controllable element to baseball operations:  plain old bad luck.

Small market teams like the Indians rely heavily on young, cost-controlled players developing into superstars, since their budget doesn’t allow them to pluck many established players off the free agent market (and the ones they do are closer to mid-tier free agents than superstars).  Because of this factor, it is vitally important for the Indians to succeed in two areas:  drafting and trading for prospects.

Of the Tribe’s whopping 17 first-round draft picks between 2000 and 2007, only Jeremy Guthrie has thus far managed to produce a career WAR value greater than 2.  Meanwhile, the Tigers drafted Justin Verlander, Andrew Miller, Cameron Maybin and Rick Porcello.  The Twins drafted Matt Garza, Joe Mauer, Trevor Plouffe, Glen Perkins, Ben Revere and Denard Span.  The Royals drafted Zack Greinke, J.P. Howell, Billy Butler, Alex Gordon, Luke Hochevar and Mike Moustakas.  Even the White Sox, who didn’t do well during that time, managed to strike gold with Gio Gonzalez while getting limited value from Brian Anderson for a few years.  And they had six fewer first-round picks during that time span.

To further illustrate my point, let’s look at how the on-field product was impacted.  If players like Jeremy Sowers (2004), Trevor Crowe (2005) and Beau Mills (2007) had been major contributors during the 2009-2012 era, the Indians might have had a fighting chance during the 2009-2012 seasons.  On the same side of the coin, you can make the argument that the Indians would have been a better team if they had drafted other players instead.  Jered Weaver (2004), Jacoby Ellsbury (2005) and Jason Heyward (2007) each went later in the round than the players mentioned above in his respective draft, and each produced at least 21 WAR before his seventh full season in the big leagues.  This argument holds less weight due to differences in player development for each franchise, but regardless, the point stands that the Indians did not draft and develop high quality MLB talent during that time, severely damaging the on-field product.

So the drafting really hurt the team.  But it stands to reason that teams can still be competitive even if they draft poorly.  After all, the Tribe had major success in many of their trades executed by then-GM Mark Shapiro.  Let’s look at a few…

2002:  Indians trade Bartolo Colon and Tim Drew for Grady Sizemore, Cliff Lee and Brandon Phillips

2002:  Indians trade Chuck Finley for Coco Crisp

2002:  Indians trade Ryan Drese and Einar Diaz for Travis Hafner

2006:  Indians trade Eduardo Perez for Asdrubal Cabrera

2006:  Indians trade Ben Broussard for Shin-Soo Choo

2008:  Indians trade Casey Blake for Carlos Santana

So, it stands to reason that the Indians franchise could have sustained itself solely on the fruits of its talent for ripping off other teams in trades.  Sadly, things didn’t work out that way:  this is the part of the story where bad luck takes the Cleveland Indians victim.

Next: Small Market Struggles

July 27, 2012; Minneapolis, MN, USA: Cleveland Indians designated hitter Travis Hafner (48) hits a single in the fifth inning against the Minnesota Twins at Target Field. Mandatory Credit: Jesse Johnson-USA TODAY Sports

Here’s where we start.  In order to be successful in the long-term, a small-market team must not only develop cost-controlled star-caliber players, but also turn them into more cost-controlled, star-caliber talent when they inevitably become too expensive for the team to keep.  Often times this means trading an established talent for high-ceiling prospects.  Whether it’s done when the player has two years left of team control or right before the trade deadline of his walk year, the team receives a package of players they hope will blossom into successful major-leaguers.  Even if the player never gets traded, a star-caliber player will at least net a compensatory draft pick when he walks in free agency.  When a player received in one of these two ways develops into a successful major-leaguer, the team has successfully extended the value of its star-caliber player through another generation.  It is, of course, much easier to extend value by trading for a prospect who is somewhat close to the majors than it is to do so by developing a player drafted with a compensatory pick.  Regardless, the main point here is that it’s vital for a team to get at least some potential for future value for a player who blossoms into a star.

Small-market teams have a much smaller margin for error when making trades than larger-market teams do, simply because they rely on those trades to build winning teams.  Like I’ve said, they can’t simply go out and fill the holes on their rosters with whatever superstar happens to be on the free agent market that year.  So on the rare occasion that the Indians do manage to develop or acquire a superstar, they are more dependent on extending his value to the next generation than, say, the Yankees or the Angels.  For the same reason, it is important that these players retain a high level of value until they can be traded, or until the team can earn a draft pick as that player leaves.   Which is why the dramatic and downfall of three star players was so devastating to the franchise.

More from Cleveland Guardians News

Travis Hafner came to Cleveland when the Indians sent Ryan Drese and Einar Diaz to the Rangers.  No player in the trade was particularly notable at the time, but Hafner quickly developed into one of the best hitters in baseball.  Between 2004 and 2006, Hafner clubbed over a hundred home runs and compiled 15.7 fWAR.  During that time, his wOBA was never below .418, and his wRC+ was at least 158.  Hafner was an absolute force at the plate and kept getting better every year.  Then the injuries set in.  While 2007 wasn’t his greatest year, the Indians had hopes that he would return to form and signed him to a contract extension through 2012.  If Hafner had maintained his early-career level of production, he’d have given the 2008-2012 Indians a fighting chance.  At that point, the Indians would have had a flurry of ways to gain value from him.  They could have traded him at some point before or during 2012 for prospects, they could have picked up his 2013 option and then traded him for a nice return, or they could have kept him for the 2013 season and seen him contribute to the playoff run at a better production clip than Jason Giambi, possibly giving him a qualifying offer at the season’s end.  Instead, he fizzled out, and rather than gaining something from a player who was once MVP-caliber, they were left with the bill for his $2 million buyout.

Grady Sizemore alone would have seemed like a good return for Bartolo Colon.  During his rookie year he gave the Indians a 20/20 season, and repeated that rare feat for three more consecutive seasons (including a 30/30 in 2008) while winning a two gold gloves and making three All-Star Game appearances.  Overall, he hit 107 homers between 2005 and 2008 while stealing a whopping 115 bases and producing 26.9 fWAR, all while playing well above-average defense at a premium position.  In 2009, however, an elbow issue plagued him throughout the season and hurt his performance.  He was even put on the DL with elbow inflammation for a stretch, beginning on May 31st.  The timing of the elbow injury was devastating, particularly because it hurt his value at a time when the Indians could have traded him.  At the deadline in 2009, the Indians got great returns for Cliff Lee and Victor Martinez, and could have gotten an equally overwhelming package for a healthy and productive Grady Sizemore.  Unfortunately, contending teams weren’t interested in an injured Sizemore who wasn’t producing like his former self, and the Indians kept him in hopes that he would rebound.  He never did.  After essentially paying him $5 million to rehab in 2012, the Indians cut ties with him without reaping any future value from his faded superstar status.

The Indians need a turnaround from Fausto Carmona

Roberto Hernandez (or Fausto Carmona, as we was known during his better days) was inconsistent throughout his career but did manage to garner some Cy Young attention for his excellent 2007 season.  He also earned an all-star appearance in 2010.  The Indians got unlucky with Hernandez in a number of ways.  First, he never managed to replicate his 2007 performance.  This was partly due to a freak accident hip injury he suffered while running to cover first base early in 2008.  He actually began that year looking exactly like his 2007 self; in his first 8 games he managed a 2.39 ERA in 49 innings pitched, largely due to a 66.3% ground ball rate.  After his return from the injury, however, and through all of 2009, he pitched at replacement level.  He did have a bit of a bounce back year in 2010, however, and this is where another bit of bad luck comes in.  See, the Indians operate partially on the motto “29 and decline”.  Due to extensive research incorporated into building their “DiamondView” player projection and analysis program, one simple fact is evident:  most players peak at the age of 29 and begin a slow, gradual decline afterwards.  Now during 2010, Fausto Carmona had a 3.77 ERA and was believed to be pitching at the age of 26.  It was later learned, however, that his name was Roberto Hernandez and that he was actually pitching at the age of, you guessed it, 29 years old.  If the Indians had known that his bounce-back 2010 was actually the start of his decline, they would have had the option to take action and trade him at his peak.  If they’d done just that, they’d have pulled in some prospects in return for a player who had mostly options left on his contract, reaping future value that would have helped the more recent Indians teams.  As things unfolded, however, the Indians didn’t find out about his actual age until he was arrested for identity fraud prior to the 2012 season.  After serving a 3-week suspension, he pitched during the Tribe’s historically terrible August (during which they lost more games than any other month in Indians history), contributing to the failure with a 7.53 ERA.  The Indians allowed a fallen, out-of-shape 32 year-old Roberto Hernandez to walk in free agency at the end of the season, getting no future value from his once-spectacular talent.

The bad luck doesn’t stop there.  Michael Brantley and Carlos Carrasco are making the C.C. Sabathia and Cliff Lee trades look pretty good right now, but for a while they were considered phenomenal failures.  You can still make an argument that they didn’t reap as good of a return as they should have for two Cy Young Award-winners.  The failures of the two main pieces in those trades- Matt LaPorta and Jason Knapp, respectively- was also partly due to a lot of bad luck.

Matt LaPorta tore it up in the lower levels of the minor leagues, causing some scouts to dub him “the next Ryan Braun”.  He played passable outfield defense and clubbed homers left and right. Unfortunately, a series of ill-timed back and hip injuries obstructed his development, caused him to miss playing time, and lead to him tinkering with his swing to a point where he began to lose power began to produce weak ground balls.  He bounced back and forth between AAA and the majors for two years before the Tribe finally gave up on him in 2013.

Jason Knapp entered 2010 as number 64 on Baseball America’s top prospect list.  However, a shoulder injury caused him to miss all of 2011, and he lost major development time recovering.  After his second shoulder surgery in 2012, the Indians made the decision to release him.

It’s an obvious and unnecessary statement that it’s rare for everything to go exactly right in baseball.  But in a perfect world for the Indians, they’d have Matt LaPorta and Jason Knapp still playing well above-average baseball for the team, plus hefty prospect or draft pick returns for Hafner, Sizemore and Hernandez either with the team or in the upper minors.  Roster depth and the farm system would be even bigger strengths for the organization.  As it stands though, every single one of those opportunities had something go terribly wrong, almost entirely out of the organization’s control.  If all of these players had worked out, climbing out of the 2009-2012 rut would have been significantly easier.  As it stands, the organization has worked very hard (and done a very good job) over the past few years to get the Tribe in a position to contend.  But even if just LaPorta and Knapp had avoided injury, the Tribe would probably not have signed Nick Swisher, and would have had another top-of-the-rotation arm pitching during the 2013 playoff run.

The lesson to be learned is that the front office deserves a lot of respect for putting the team in the position it’s in right now.  As the saying goes, sometimes you have to “roll with the punches”, and the team has bounced back from quite a few rough ones.

Next